<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quickie Survey: Payment Terms for New vs. Existing Customers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmmireports.org/pmmi/2010/04/08/quickie-survey-payment-terms-for-new-vs-existing-customers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmmireports.org/pmmi/2010/04/08/quickie-survey-payment-terms-for-new-vs-existing-customers/</link>
	<description>Brought to you by Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Institute</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:42:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Payment Terms: New Versus Existing Customers &#171; The Hub</title>
		<link>http://www.pmmireports.org/pmmi/2010/04/08/quickie-survey-payment-terms-for-new-vs-existing-customers/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Payment Terms: New Versus Existing Customers &#171; The Hub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmmireports.org/pmmi/?p=288#comment-104</guid>
		<description>[...] existing ones, most companies appear to treat both the same. That’s the result of an April  “quickie survey” conducted by PMMI, or the Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Institute. About 60 percent of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] existing ones, most companies appear to treat both the same. That’s the result of an April  “quickie survey” conducted by PMMI, or the Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Institute. About 60 percent of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

